What Does the CFPB’s New Public Registry to Detect Repeat Offenders Mean for Your Business?
On June 3, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued the Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders Final Rule (“the Final Rule”).
The Final Rule, effective September 16, 2024, establishes a public registry of nonbank financial companies that have violated consumer protection laws and will require covered entities to report final judgments, settlements, or other enforcement orders to the CFPB.
Citing the efficacy of other registries for law enforcement and consumer purposes, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra noted that the Final Rule will enable the agency, law enforcement, and the general public to conduct due diligence on firms and discover any misconduct.[1] The rule follows the creation of a Repeat Offender Unit and emerges as part of the CFPB’s broad focus on reining in corporate recidivism and ‘rinse-and-repeat’ enforcement.
Who Does the Final Rule Apply to?
The rule applies to certain nonbanks that are “covered persons” under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). However, the following are excluded from the rule:
- insured depository institutions,
- insured credit unions,
- related persons,
- states,
- certain motor vehicle dealers,
- natural persons, and
- entities that qualify as “covered persons” solely because of conduct excluded from the CFPB’s rulemaking authority, such as activity related to charitable contributions.
Which Orders Does the Final Rule Apply to?
Covered entities must report all final public orders and judgments, including consent and stipulated orders and judgments obtained or issued by the CFPB or any government agency for violation of consumer protection laws.
An order is covered by the Final Rule if it:
- identifies a covered entity by name,
- was issued in part of a proceeding brought by any Federal, State, or local agency based on an alleged violation of a covered law, and
- contains public provisions imposing obligations on the covered nonbank to take certain actions or refrain from taking certain actions.
Importantly, covered entities must report public orders that took effect on or after January 1, 2017, or that were entered into earlier but whose terms are still effective as of September 2024.
Registration Information
The rule’s registration requirements begin on September 16, 2024. While the CFPB’s filing instructions have yet to be finalized, the following information will be required:
- identity information, such as the entity’s legal name and address of its principal place of business;
- administrative information, such as a registered entity’s affiliates that are registered with respect to the same order; and
- covered order information, such as a PDF of the original order, the court or agency that issued it, the effective and expiration date, the laws found to be violated (or alleged to be violated for consent orders), and a docket, case, or other identifying number.
Annual Written Statement by Attesting Executive
CFPB-supervised covered nonbanks have an additional requirement: an attesting senior executive must annually review and submit written information regarding covered orders. This written statement must bear the name and title of an attesting executive with respect to each of the covered orders registered and confirm compliance with any relevant orders.
Six trade groups sent a letter to the CFPB, arguing that the attestation requirement is arbitrary and capricious and could harm the hiring and retention of senior executives responsible for compliance.
The CFPB countered that most of these entities already have systems and procedures in place to achieve compliance so that the attestation requirement will impose only modest costs. The Bureau further stated that it would not publish the written statements. However, it “does intend to publish the name and title of the attesting executive(s)…” because doing so “will increase the likelihood of compliance.”
What Should Your Business Do Next?
Businesses should take the following steps to ensure they comply with the Final Rule before it takes effect on September 16, 2024:
- Understand whether your business fits the appropriate definition for a covered entity.
- Review inventory agreements or orders your business has entered into to determine whether registration is required. This may be particularly tricky for certain state licensing orders.
- Even if not required by a formal agreement, your business should begin preparing to review and audit the issues that formed the basis of any settlement to ensure you are not at risk of becoming a “repeat offender.”
Law clerk Rebecca Webber contributed to this post. She is not currently admitted to practice law.
[1]Rohit Chopra, Prepared Remarks of CFPB Director Rohit Chopra on the Final Rule to Detect and Deter Repeat Offender, Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/prepared-remarks-of-cfpb-director-rohit-chopra-on-the-final-rule-to-detect-and-deter-repeat-offenders/ (June 3, 2024).
Topics
- ACA
- ACA International
- Amicus Brief
- Anti-Discrimination Policy
- Appellate Decisions
- Appointment Power
- Appraised Value
- Arbitration
- Arbitration Rule
- Article III Standing
- ATDS
- Attorneys' Fees
- Auto-Dialer
- Automatic Telephone Dialing System
- Bankruptcy
- Bankruptcy Code
- behavioral economics
- Biden Administration
- Biometric Information Privacy Act
- Bitcoin
- Blockchain
- BNPL
- Business Records
- California
- California Consumer Financial Protection Law
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- California Court of Appeal
- California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation
- Car Dealership
- CARES Act
- CCPA
- CDC
- CFPA
- CFPB
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
- Circuit Split
- City of Miami
- Civil Contempt
- Claim-Splitting
- Class Action
- Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
- Class Certification
- Climate Change
- Cole Memorandum
- Colorado
- Commercial Foreclosure
- Communications
- Compliance
- Compliance Audit
- Compliance Corner
- Congressional Review Act
- Connecticut
- Connecticut Insurance Department
- Constitutional Claims
- Consumer Data Privacy
- Consumer Disclosures
- Consumer Financial Protection Act
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Consumer Protections
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
- Corporate Compliance
- Corporate Governance
- COVID-19
- CPRA
- Craigslist
- Credit Report
- Credit Reporting Agencies
- Creditor
- Cryptocurrency
- cyber regulation
- Cybersecurity
- D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
- Damages
- Data Breach
- Data Privacy Laws
- Data Security
- Debt Buyers
- Debt Collection
- Debt Collector
- Debt Dispute
- Debt Purchase
- Debtor
- Deceased Debtors
- Default Notice
- Department of Education
- Department of Financial Protection and Innovation
- Department of Financial Services
- DFPI
- DFS
- DFS Part 500
- Digital Financial Asset Law
- Disclosure
- Discovery Rule
- District of Columbia
- Document Retention
- Dodd-Frank
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- Due Process Clause
- ECOA
- Economic Impact Payment
- Education
- Education Debt
- Eighth Amendment
- Electronic Communications
- Eleventh Amendment
- Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- Employee Benefits
- Employer Participation Student Loan Assistance Act
- Equal Opportunity Act
- European General Data Privacy Regulation
- Eviction
- Excessive Fines Clause
- Executive Order
- Exempt Status
- Exemption
- FACTA
- Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
- Fair Credit Billing Act
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Fair Lending
- Fair Market Value
- Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017
- FCBA
- FCC
- FCRA
- FDCPA
- Federal
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Housing Administration
- Federal Housing Finance Agency
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 68
- Federal Trade Commission
- FHA
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Final Rule
- Financial CHOICE Act
- Financial Registration
- Financial Regulatory
- Financial Risk
- FinTech
- First Amendment
- First Circuit Court of Appeals
- Florida
- Florida Supreme Court
- For-Profit Student Loans
- Forbearance
- Forbearance Agreement
- Foreclosure
- Foreclosure Sale
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
- FTC
- Furnishers
- GDPR
- hacking
- Hardship Declaration
- HealthTech
- Hearsay
- HMDA
- Hobbs Act
- HUD
- Human Intervention Test
- Hunstein
- IDFPR
- Illinois
- Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act
- Illinois Predatory Loan Prevention Act
- Illinois Student Loan Bill of Rights
- Illinois Supreme Court
- Investigation
- IRS
- Judicial Estoppel
- Kathleen Kraninger
- Kentucky
- kickbacks
- Lack of Standing
- Landlord and Tenant
- Least Sophisticated Consumer Standard
- Legal Standing
- Legislation
- Lender Credit Bid
- LGBTQ
- Licensing
- Litigation
- Loan Defaults
- Loan Discharge
- Loan Modification
- Loan Servicing
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Mandatory Arbitration
- Marijuana
- Marketing Services Agreements
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Appeals Court
- Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act
- Massachusetts Land Court
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- Material Misrepresentation
- Materiality Requirement
- Medical Debts
- Medical Expenses
- Medical Marijuana
- Minnesota
- Monetary Damages
- Mortgage
- Mortgage Acceleration
- Mortgage Debt
- Mortgage Foreclosure
- Mortgage Loan Acceleration
- Mortgage Loans
- Mortgage Servicers
- Mortgage Servicing
- Motion to Dismiss
- MSA
- Municipal Code
- Municipal Code Violations
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New York
- New York Court of Appeals
- New York Department of Financial Services
- New York Legislation
- New York Real Property Procedures and Acts
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- NMLS
- North Carolina
- North Carolina Consumer Finance Act
- North Dakota
- Notice of Proposed Rule Making
- NPRM
- NYCRA
- NYS DFS
- Obama Administration
- OFAC
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Origination
- Paragraph 22
- Part 500
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Post-Discharge-Communications
- PPP
- Pre-Foreclosure Mediation
- Preemption
- Privacy
- Private Colleges and Universities
- Private Right of Action
- Private Student Loans
- Property Rights
- Property Value
- Proposed Legislation
- Real Estate Settlement Act
- Redlining
- referral fees
- Regulated Entities
- Regulated Non-Depositories
- Regulated Organizations
- Regulation
- Regulation X
- Regulatory
- Regulatory Compliance
- Regulatory Relief
- Remote Working
- Residential Foreclosure
- RESPA
- Reverse Mortgage
- Revocation Claims
- Revocation of Election to Accelerate
- Rhode Island
- Rhode Island Supreme Court
- Richard Cordray
- RICO
- Right of Redemption
- Right to Cure
- Right to Cure Notice
- Right to Reinstate
- Risk Management
- Robocalls
- Rohit Chopra
- S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act
- Safe-Harbor Provision
- Sanitary Codes
- SCOTUS
- Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Separation of Powers
- Settlement
- Settlement Conference
- Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Social Media
- Standard of Proof
- Statute of Limitations
- Statutory Damages
- Statutory Interpretation
- Stimulus
- Student Loans
- Students
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Tax
- Tax Implications
- Tax Lien
- TCPA
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Texas
- Texting
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- TILA
- Trump
- Trump Administration
- Truth in Lending Act
- U.S. Constitution
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- UCC
- UDAAP
- Unauthorized Use
- Undue Hardship
- Unfair and Deceptive Practices
- Unfair Competition
- Uniform Commercial Code
- United States Treasury
- Unsolicited Advertisement
- Usury Laws
- Utah
- Video Conferencing
- Virginia
- Virtual Currency Business Act (VCBA)
- Voluntary Discontinuance
- Voluntary Dismissal
- Washington D.C.
- Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Consumer Act